The EF-S 10-22 is not a bad lens (not great either) but why would you spend over $1000 on a lens that you can only use on one of your bodies.
There is a number of third part options, but I have never really found them up to scratch with a good L series Canon lens.
17-40F4.0L is my vote for sure.
Fusionize wrote:Basically the lens that goes on this body will stay on the body and will never be removed.
fireman_gaz wrote:Fusionize wrote:Basically the lens that goes on this body will stay on the body and will never be removed.
Why would you do that?
I have a small compliment of lenses and they swap back and forth between bodies all the time.
I would go as close as saying that once you get the 17-40 on the 5D you won't ever use the 20D for landscapes again.
David Anderson wrote:The 17-40 is a great lens IMO and will be great when/if you get a full frame in the future.
Some of the stuff I've seen of a mates off his 20D is awesome.
The 24-105 is not a great match for a crop frame, though it is a good lens, just not wide enough really.
I would hang for a bit before buying any lenses as they might have new stuff for photokina in September.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest